SIH26055SoftwareRobotics and Drones
₹1,50,000 Prize (₹75k Joint)
•
Deadline: 20 September 2026
•
Submitted Ideas: 0/500

Smart Scan strategy for Electronic Warfare

Ministry / Organization: DRDO
Department: Department of Defence Production /IDEX
Technical Complexity
8/10
Dataset Accessibility
7/10
36h Hackathon Viability
9/10
Step 0 • Zero-Jargon Layman Summary

“Modern electronic warfare requires scanning wide radio frequencies to detect enemy radar or communication signals without prior intel. Since traditional fixed-pattern scanning wastes time on harmless signals, we are building an intelligent machine learning scheduler that dynamically decides which frequency band to scan next to catch threats instantly.”

The DecodeX PS Decoder™

Deconstructed Problem Blueprint

Step 1

WHAT TO BUILD?

An AI/ML-driven Electronic Support (ES) receiver scheduling software simulator that optimizes frequency band scanning strategy using reinforcement learning or predictive analytics to minimize intercept time and maximize interception rates.

Step 2

WHO IS IT FOR?

DRDO, Department of Defence Production, and IDEX; used by Electronic Warfare (EW) operators, defense intelligence analysts, and autonomous defense systems.

Step 3

WHY DOES IT EXIST?

Traditional 'open loop' scanning relies on rigid pre-mission data, causing scanners to waste critical time sweeping non-threatening frequencies while missing rapid, frequency-agile, or newly activated hostile emitters.

Step 4

INPUT → PROCESS → OUTPUT ARCHITECTURE PIPELINE

01 • Inputs & Telemetry

Simulated RF environment metrics from datasets (e.g., JC Wise Radar Emitter Database, Turing Synthetic Radar dataset), status of emitters per frequency band, historical hits/misses, and spatial scan parameters.

02 • Processing & AI Core

Reinforcement Learning (RL) or multi-armed bandit algorithms updating transition probabilities, reward/cost functions, and predicting optimal next-frequency hops based on past interception performance.

03 • Actionable Deliverables

A dynamic scan schedule dashboard displaying real-time interception ratios, average intercept time error, probability of detection, and visual threat heatmaps.

Step 5

CONSTRAINTS

  • Must operate in simulated or real-time RF environments with high signal density.
  • Real-time decision-making latency must be minimal to counter frequency-agile emitters.
  • Handling high false alarm rates against non-threatening or decoy emitters.
Step 6

JURY METRICS

  • Probability of detection and probability of false alarm rates
  • Average intercept time and intercept time error
  • Interception ratio against frequency-agile and spatially scanning emitters
  • Average reward/cost function optimization
Step 7

CORE BOTTLENECK

Designing an adaptive Reinforcement Learning scheduler that generalizes well against unseen, highly agile, and intermittent radar signals without over-fitting to known simulation datasets.

Why You Should Choose This PS (Pros)

  • High national security value and direct IDEX/DRDO alignment.
  • Clear algorithmic problem with mathematically measurable performance metrics.
  • Standout software entry in a theme typically cluttered with hardware drone builds.

Challenges & Risks to Watch (Cons)

  • Complex underlying math (Signal Processing, Reinforcement Learning, Markov Decision Processes).
  • Requires synthetic data generation if raw RF datasets are difficult to parse within 36 hours.
Hackathon Blueprint

Recommended Tech Stack & Grand Finale Features

Frontend & Mobile
React.jsTailwind CSSChart.js / D3.js for RF spectrum visualization
Backend & APIs
FastAPI / PythonWebSockets for real-time simulation updates
AI / ML & Models
Reinforcement Learning (PPO / DQN using Gym environments)Multi-Armed Bandit algorithmsScikit-learn for baseline predictors
Database & Cloud
PostgreSQLRedis for fast state caching

Killer Features to Impress the SIH Jury

Interactive RF Environment Simulator where judges can dynamically spawn agile/stealth emitters and watch the AI adapt its scan path in real-time.
Automated Performance Analytics Suite generating instant figures of merit (intercept ratio, reward curves, false alarm matrices).
Adaptive Threat Prioritization Heatmap highlighting high-risk frequency bands dynamically.
View Official SIH 2026 Portal Raw Text
▼

Development of Smart Scan Strategy for Electronic Warfare in the absence of prior reliable intelligence of emitters and their operating characteristics.

•Background Detection of hostile communication or radar signals starts with search / scan of a wide frequency spectrum which covers relevant emitters. Sensors with typically high sensitivity but with at least an order lower instantaneous bandwidth compared to overall bandwidth of the system are used to maintain surveillance over the entire spectrum. This requires a receiver / receivers to sweep over frequency bands. Hitherto strategies based on pre mission data / prior data (Open loop) are used. Usually the first priority is to rapidly sweep the entire band with the best speed possible. Open loop strategies focus only on this requirement and may lose time to nonthreatening emitters by not giving time to new or threatening ones.
•Detailed Description This problem statement focusses on development of Smart Scan Strategy for Electronic Warfare. Interception of signals is a two dimensional search problem since it involves adjusting receiver’s frequency at correct time. This includes building up figures of merit for interception performance such as probability of detection, probability of false alarm, sensitivity, Avg intercept rate, Avg Reward / cost function, percentage of correct predictions and average intercept time error. A system model for the receiver needs to be developed with measurements obtained from a simulated RF environment which has truth information on status of emitters in each band and at each time slot. The frequency spectrum for own receiver consists of many bands.

The status of environment for each frequency band at each time step can be recorded as a transmission or a non-transmission. The model should enable prediction of intercept time and interception ratio of a scanning receiver against spatially scanning and frequency agile emitters. Development of a robust scheduler using machine learning to minimize intercept time and ensure a high interception rate is the primary objective of the strategy. The model should then be trained based on hits and misses. Further, approaches to intercept a periodic scan receiver optimally should be outlined. Algorithms and techniques for the same need to be developed.

•Expected Solution Machine learning based Electronic Support receiver scheduler software