Real-Time Identification of Fraud-Linked Cryptocurrency Exchanges from Victim-Reported Suspect Wallet Addresses through Automated Blockchain Analytics
“When cyber fraud victims report stolen cryptocurrency, police struggle to track where the funds went because scammers hide them through multiple dummy wallets. This platform automatically traces those stolen crypto tokens across different blockchains to pinpoint the exact commercial exchange where the criminal is about to cash out, allowing police to freeze the assets immediately.”
Deconstructed Problem Blueprint
WHAT TO BUILD?
An enterprise-grade Real-Time Crypto Fraud Attribution and Blockchain Forensics Software Platform.
WHO IS IT FOR?
The problem belongs to the Ministry of Home Affairs (Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre - I4C). The primary users are law enforcement agency (LEA) investigators, cybercrime cell officers, and financial intelligence units in India.
WHY DOES IT EXIST?
Manual blockchain investigation requires specialized expertise and hours of laborious manual work across block explorers. Meanwhile, cybercriminals rapidly move funds across cross-chain bridges and privacy mixers to cash out on centralized exchanges before police can issue legal freeze notices.
INPUT → PROCESS → OUTPUT ARCHITECTURE PIPELINE
Victim-reported scam suspect wallet addresses, associated transaction hashes, complaint metadata from NCRP (National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal) and SAHYOG systems.
Multi-chain transaction graph indexing, heuristic and ML-based clustering of exchange deposit addresses, heuristic identification of laundering hops, cross-chain bridge mapping, and risk-scoring algorithms.
Actionable investigator dashboards, visual fund-flow dependency graphs, automated VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) identification alerts, and standardized mutual legal assistance / exchange freeze report documents.
CONSTRAINTS
- Must support high-throughput real-time indexing across multiple EVM and non-EVM chains (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, Polygon, etc.)
- Strict data privacy and compliance standards for handling sensitive law enforcement data
- API rate-limiting constraints of public blockchain nodes and block explorer APIs
JURY METRICS
- End-to-end tracing and VASP identification latency (under 30 seconds per query)
- Accuracy of exchange deposit address clustering (precision and recall)
- UI/UX simplicity and clarity for non-technical law enforcement officers
- Seamless mock integration with NCRP/SAHYOG data structures
CORE BOTTLENECK
Accurately clustering thousands of anonymous exchange deposit addresses without having proprietary internal exchange datasets, and handling multi-hop obfuscation through mixers and cross-chain bridges.
Why You Should Choose This PS (Pros)
- Extremely high national security and social impact directly solving a major mandate for the Ministry of Home Affairs
- Clear, structured deliverables with obvious visual components (dashboards and interactive graphs)
- Strong 'wow factor' during live demos via dynamic fund-flow visualizations
Challenges & Risks to Watch (Cons)
- Requires handling complex graph databases and real-time streaming data architectures
- Public blockchain RPC nodes can be unstable or rate-limited during heavy usage
- Crowded domain if teams only build a basic block explorer wrapper without proprietary intelligence logic
Recommended Tech Stack & Grand Finale Features
Killer Features to Impress the SIH Jury
View Official SIH 2026 Portal Raw Text▼
During investigations, the reported wallet addresses are often:
The inability to quickly identify the cryptocurrency exchange or VASP associated with these wallets delays:
Manual blockchain tracing requires significant technical expertise and time, particularly in cases involving:
The system should:
Key features may include:
The system should support multiple blockchain ecosystems and provide:
The system should:
The platform should further support:

