Automated Attribution of Unknown Cryptocurrency Wallets to Nearest Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) through Blockchain Intelligence APIs
“When criminals use cryptocurrencies, law enforcement struggles to figure out which crypto exchange or wallet provider holds the stolen funds because transactions bounce through many unknown intermediate accounts. This software automatically tracks those complex blockchain pathways, links the suspect's money to the exact nearest exchange, and helps officers file legal freeze requests directly through the SAHYOG portal.”
Deconstructed Problem Blueprint
WHAT TO BUILD?
An automated Blockchain Intelligence and VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) Attribution Engine integrated with the I4C SAHYOG Portal via APIs, capable of tracing multi-chain transaction paths and identifying the nearest direct deposit exchange.
WHO IS IT FOR?
The primary user is the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) under the Ministry of Home Affairs, alongside state and central Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) and investigating officers handling cryptocurrency-related financial cybercrimes.
WHY DOES IT EXIST?
Current crypto investigations require manual, tedious tracing of blockchain blocks across multiple public ledgers. Investigators often hit dead ends when dealing with unhosted wallets, mixers, cross-chain bridges, and unknown intermediary hops, leading to critical delays in freezing assets before criminals cash out.
INPUT → PROCESS → OUTPUT ARCHITECTURE PIPELINE
Suspicious cryptocurrency wallet addresses, case metadata from the SAHYOG portal, blockchain node RPC endpoints, and transaction history feeds from multi-chain ledgers (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, BNB Chain, Solana, Polygon).
Graph-based transaction path traversal, heuristic-based cluster identification (hot wallets, mixers, bridges), multi-hop deposit address tracing, risk scoring algorithms, and VASP ownership attribution engines.
Investigation-ready visual transaction flow graphs, ranked confidence scores for suspected VASPs, automated asset-freezing dispatch tickets, and downloadable compliance-ready reports for LEAs.
CONSTRAINTS
- Must support multi-chain transaction parsing across high-throughput and UTXO-based ledgers.
- Strict data privacy, evidentiary integrity, and compliance with Indian legal framework for digital evidence handling.
- API rate limits and transaction gas costs associated with public blockchain RPC providers.
- Low latency generation of attribution reports for real-time cybercrime intervention.
JURY METRICS
- Accuracy and precision of VASP attribution against known ground-truth cluster datasets.
- Traversal depth and speed in mapping multi-hop transaction flows across diverse chains.
- UI/UX simplicity and time-reduction in generating actionable LEA freezing requests.
- System scalability and resilience under high-concurrency investigative case loads.
CORE BOTTLENECK
De-anonymizing funds routed through complex privacy tools like coin mixers, multi-sig decentralized bridges, and cross-chain swaps without incurring exponential computational delays.
Why You Should Choose This PS (Pros)
- Extremely high national security and real-world utility for the Ministry of Home Affairs.
- Clear, modular system architecture that allows for rapid feature scaling during a 36-hour hackathon.
- Strong visual 'wow factor' through interactive graph networks and real-time transaction tracing maps.
Challenges & Risks to Watch (Cons)
- Requires integration with multiple blockchain APIs or custom node infrastructure which can be flaky.
- Complex heuristic rules required to cluster exchanges and deposit addresses accurately.
- Crowded domain if teams rely purely on generic public blockchain explorer tools without proprietary intelligence logic.
Recommended Tech Stack & Grand Finale Features
Killer Features to Impress the SIH Jury
View Official SIH 2026 Portal Raw Text▼
Under the existing investigation workflow, LEAs raise lawful information disclosure requests through the SAHYOG Portal to Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) such as crypto exchanges, custodial wallet providers, and trading platforms. However, in many cases, the suspect wallet identified during investigations belongs to an unhosted wallet or a wallet for which the associated VASP is unknown. This creates major delays in attribution, freezing of assets, and identification of the beneficial owner.
Blockchain transactions generally pass through multiple intermediary wallets before reaching centralized exchanges. Identifying the 'nearest direct deposit accepting exchange' manually through blockchain analysis is time-consuming and requires specialized expertise.
The system should:
o nearest centralized exchange, o custodial wallet service, o or VASP receiving direct deposits from the suspect wallet.
o Bitcoin, o Ethereum, o Tron, o BNB Chain, o Solana, o Polygon o and other major chains.
o exchange clusters, o hot wallets, o deposit wallets, o mixers/tumblers, o DeFi bridges, o and cross-chain swap services.
The system may additionally support:
The solution should aim to:

